Justice Artificial Intelligence to support court cases

 

China is surprising the world with every new innovative technology and its implementation for the facilitation and benefits of humans. Recently it experimented Artificial intelligence application for dealing with court cases.

Little wisdom or  Xiao Zhi3.0 , the justice AI has formerly supported a trial in which ten banks defaulters were dealt with in the court as they had failed to repay the bank loans.

The world has been seeing advancement of artificial intelligence technology in aid of humans with their assignments and office work, but courts in China are moving quite ahead using Justice Artificial Intelligence program to give instant justice. This was initiated in the court in Megacity of Hangzhou. China has started using an AI judge adjunct program to give instant justice.

A speedy and fair justice is anticipated with the use of AI tool.

The new AI tool makes the Chinese justice system a lot briskly since it can deal with all small and diurnal life cases.

In the recent court case with over 10 people, it would have taken around 10 different court sessions and weeks worth of time. Xiao Zhi on the other hand resolved all ten cases together and delivered a decision in just over 30 twinkles.

Courts are known to have a bunch of repetitious statements similar as court procedure adverts. Xiao Zhi has also overhauled that job and announces the court procedure during sounds.

Xiao Zhi also collects case information , analyzes case  and indeed verifies them through its database and intelligence.

Presently, the Xiao Zhi is substantially being used in fiscal controversies, but analogous AI tools are being used in other Chinese courts for settling business controversies.

Shitong Qiao, professor of law at Duke Law School, speaking about AI said that “ I can see the temptation for Chinese courts to borrow AI indeed in felonious cases. One of the challenges for Chinese felonious justice is to insure uniformity. They want to make sure that across different regions of China, the penalties are harmonious with one another. ”

Zhiyu Li, an adjunct professor in law and policy at Durham University still has other beliefs, he says that “ While judges and prosecutors have the liberty to ignore or reject these suggestions for felonious corrections, we don’t know if it may nevertheless sway their decision- making unconsciously due to cognitive impulses ”.